Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.
World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
LogRocket vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LogRocket (Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.) and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over LogRocket (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 42). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is ahead of LogRocket. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LogRocket is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is ahead of LogRocket. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LogRocket is ahead of Teamwork.com.
LogRocket carries 6,668 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LogRocket's footprint is roughly 3.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
LogRocket is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LogRocket | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 48 |
| Code | 46 | 58 |
| Education | 62 | 59 |
| Community | 23 | 37 |
| Reach | 22 | 47 |
| Momentum | 43 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,668 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 379 | 384 |
| Public repos | 16 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 14 |
| External contributors | 2 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 20 | 38 |