Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.
LogRocket vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LogRocket (Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over LogRocket (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 42). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of LogRocket. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is ahead of LogRocket. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LogRocket is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LogRocket is slightly ahead of Zammad.
LogRocket carries 6,668 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.
LogRocket is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LogRocket | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 52 |
| Code | 46 | 63 |
| Education | 62 | 71 |
| Community | 23 | 70 |
| Reach | 22 | 0 |
| Momentum | 43 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,668 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 379 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 16 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 9 |
| External contributors | 2 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 20 | 35 |