Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

LogRocket vs Zammad

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

LogRocket (Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over LogRocket (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 42). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of LogRocket. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is ahead of LogRocket. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LogRocket is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LogRocket is slightly ahead of Zammad.

LogRocket carries 6,668 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.

LogRocket is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricLogRocketZammad
Ranking
Overall rank#372#152
Pillars
Overall4252
Code4663
Education6271
Community2370
Reach220
Momentum4339
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,6686,394
Forks3791,687
Public repos1611
Active repos (90d)59
External contributors227
Avg polish4271
Avg AI-readiness2035

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View LogRocket developer profileView Zammad developer profile