Async Video Messaging for Work
Loom vs Orca Security
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and Orca Security both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Orca Security (rank #568) holds a narrow lead over Loom (rank #692) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Orca Security is slightly ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Orca Security is slightly ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Orca Security is ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Loom.
Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Orca Security shows 230 stars across 35 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Orca Security's footprint is roughly 4.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Loom is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Orca Security looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Loom | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #692 | #568 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 35 |
| Code | 37 | 40 |
| Education | 52 | 57 |
| Community | 11 | 37 |
| Reach | 3 | 21 |
| Momentum | 30 | 59 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 50 | 230 |
| Forks | 13 | 73 |
| Public repos | 32 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 17 |
| External contributors | 1 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 32 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 23 |