Loom vs Plausible Analytics

Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Plausible Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Plausible Analytics is slightly ahead of Loom.

Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Plausible Analytics shows 31,145 stars across 21 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Plausible Analytics's footprint is roughly 622.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Loom is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Plausible Analytics looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.