Async Video Messaging for Work
Loom vs Segment
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and Segment both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Segment (rank #103) holds a meaningful lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 31). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Segment is ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Segment is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Segment is clearly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Segment is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Segment is ahead of Loom.
Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Segment shows 58,406 stars across 421 public repos, 53 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Segment's footprint is roughly 1168.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Loom is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Segment looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Loom | Segment |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #103 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 55 |
| Code | 37 | 57 |
| Education | 52 | 72 |
| Community | 11 | 56 |
| Reach | 3 | 40 |
| Momentum | 30 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 50 | 58,406 |
| Forks | 13 | 7,570 |
| Public repos | 32 | 421 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 53 |
| External contributors | 1 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 32 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 41 |