Loom vs Teamwork.com

Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 31). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Loom is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com.

Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Teamwork.com's footprint is roughly 42.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Loom is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.