Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Loom vs Uptime.com

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and Uptime.com (Uptime.com is an industry-leading website monitoring solution.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Uptime.com (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Loom (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Loom is slightly ahead of Uptime.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Uptime.com is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Uptime.com is ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Uptime.com is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Uptime.com is slightly ahead of Loom.

Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Uptime.com shows 35 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.

Loom is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Uptime.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricLoomUptime.com
Ranking
Overall rank#696#625
Pillars
Overall3133
Code3736
Education5265
Community1128
Reach339
Momentum3031
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars5035
Forks1334
Public repos329
Active repos (90d)56
External contributors14
Avg polish3242
Avg AI-readiness3429

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Loom developer profileView Uptime.com developer profile