Async Video Messaging for Work
Loom vs UptimeRobot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and UptimeRobot (Leading Uptime Monitoring Service) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UptimeRobot (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 31). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), UptimeRobot is slightly ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UptimeRobot is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UptimeRobot is clearly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UptimeRobot is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UptimeRobot is clearly ahead of Loom.
Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. UptimeRobot shows 81 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors.
Loom is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. UptimeRobot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Loom | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 37 |
| Code | 37 | 38 |
| Education | 52 | 62 |
| Community | 11 | 35 |
| Reach | 3 | 28 |
| Momentum | 30 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 50 | 81 |
| Forks | 13 | 24 |
| Public repos | 32 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 6 |
| External contributors | 1 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 32 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 37 |