Loom vs UXPin

Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Loom is slightly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UXPin is slightly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UXPin is slightly ahead of Loom.

Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but UXPin's footprint is roughly 17.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Loom is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.