Loom vs Zscaler, Inc.

Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 31). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Loom.

Loom carries 50 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zscaler, Inc.'s footprint is roughly 6.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Loom is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.