Magical tools for data.
Mage vs Unstructured
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Mage (Magical tools for data.) and Unstructured both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Unstructured (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Mage (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 38). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Unstructured is clearly ahead of Mage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Unstructured is slightly ahead of Mage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Unstructured is ahead of Mage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mage is slightly ahead of Unstructured. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Unstructured is slightly ahead of Mage.
Mage carries 9,079 GitHub stars across 44 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Unstructured shows 16,922 stars across 42 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 48 external contributors.
Mage is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Unstructured looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Mage | Unstructured |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #209 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 49 |
| Code | 34 | 59 |
| Education | 71 | 79 |
| Community | 38 | 48 |
| Reach | 40 | 37 |
| Momentum | 16 | 19 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,079 | 16,922 |
| Forks | 1,538 | 1,756 |
| Public repos | 44 | 42 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 10 |
| External contributors | 22 | 48 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 15 | 44 |