Magical tools for data.
Vector Database for Enterprise-grade AI and LLM applications
Mage vs Zilliz
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Mage (Magical tools for data.) and Zilliz (Vector Database for Enterprise-grade AI and LLM applications) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zilliz (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Mage (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 38). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zilliz is clearly ahead of Mage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zilliz is ahead of Mage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zilliz is ahead of Mage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mage is ahead of Zilliz. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zilliz is clearly ahead of Mage.
Mage carries 9,079 GitHub stars across 44 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Zilliz shows 37,860 stars across 71 public repos, 29 active in the last 90 days and 105 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zilliz's footprint is roughly 4.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Mage is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zilliz looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Mage | Zilliz |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 54 |
| Code | 34 | 67 |
| Education | 71 | 83 |
| Community | 38 | 51 |
| Reach | 40 | 29 |
| Momentum | 16 | 50 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,079 | 37,860 |
| Forks | 1,538 | 3,995 |
| Public repos | 44 | 71 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 29 |
| External contributors | 22 | 105 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 64 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 15 | 59 |