Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.
MailerLite vs pCloud Open Source
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
MailerLite (Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.) and pCloud Open Source both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
MailerLite (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 32). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), MailerLite is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), pCloud Open Source is ahead of MailerLite. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), MailerLite is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is clearly ahead of MailerLite. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), MailerLite is clearly ahead of pCloud Open Source.
MailerLite carries 1,134 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. pCloud Open Source shows 867 stars across 16 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
MailerLite is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. pCloud Open Source looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MailerLite | pCloud Open Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 32 |
| Code | 52 | 39 |
| Education | 55 | 64 |
| Community | 28 | 27 |
| Reach | 15 | 55 |
| Momentum | 36 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,134 | 867 |
| Forks | 288 | 285 |
| Public repos | 39 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 4 |
| External contributors | 3 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 37 |