Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.
MailerLite vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
MailerLite (Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.) and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over MailerLite (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 40). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of MailerLite. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), MailerLite is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of MailerLite. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of MailerLite. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of MailerLite.
MailerLite carries 1,134 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
MailerLite is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MailerLite | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 42 |
| Code | 52 | 59 |
| Education | 55 | 52 |
| Community | 28 | 42 |
| Reach | 15 | 23 |
| Momentum | 36 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,134 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 288 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 39 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 31 |
| External contributors | 3 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 48 |