Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.
MailerLite vs Perk
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
MailerLite (Digital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.) and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Perk (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over MailerLite (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 40). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), MailerLite is slightly ahead of Perk. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), MailerLite is slightly ahead of Perk. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is ahead of MailerLite. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Perk is ahead of MailerLite. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is ahead of MailerLite.
MailerLite carries 1,134 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but MailerLite's footprint is roughly 33.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
MailerLite is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Perk looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MailerLite | Perk |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 42 |
| Code | 52 | 44 |
| Education | 55 | 54 |
| Community | 28 | 38 |
| Reach | 15 | 30 |
| Momentum | 36 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,134 | 34 |
| Forks | 288 | 11 |
| Public repos | 39 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 5 |
| External contributors | 3 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 33 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 38 |