Email service that delivers
MailerSend vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
MailerSend (Email service that delivers) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over MailerSend (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 41). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of MailerSend. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), MailerSend is slightly ahead of Qonto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), MailerSend is slightly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), MailerSend is slightly ahead of Qonto.
MailerSend carries 499 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
MailerSend is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Qonto looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MailerSend | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 43 |
| Code | 50 | 57 |
| Education | 82 | 75 |
| Community | 30 | 25 |
| Reach | 24 | 24 |
| Momentum | 27 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 499 | 501 |
| Forks | 141 | 158 |
| Public repos | 22 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 12 | 11 |
| External contributors | 7 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 36 |