Email service that delivers
We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
MailerSend vs Semrush
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
MailerSend (Email service that delivers) and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over MailerSend (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 41). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), MailerSend is slightly ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), MailerSend is ahead of Semrush. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is slightly ahead of MailerSend. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is ahead of MailerSend. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is ahead of MailerSend.
MailerSend carries 499 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
MailerSend is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Semrush looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MailerSend | Semrush |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 44 |
| Code | 50 | 44 |
| Education | 82 | 65 |
| Community | 30 | 36 |
| Reach | 24 | 35 |
| Momentum | 27 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 499 | 454 |
| Forks | 141 | 124 |
| Public repos | 22 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 12 | 2 |
| External contributors | 7 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 32 |