Malwarebytes vs Semrush

Malwarebytes (Cyberprotection for every one.) and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Semrush (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Malwarebytes (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 36). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Malwarebytes is ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Malwarebytes is slightly ahead of Semrush. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is ahead of Malwarebytes. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is slightly ahead of Malwarebytes. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Malwarebytes is clearly ahead of Semrush.

Malwarebytes carries 38 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Semrush's footprint is roughly 11.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Malwarebytes is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Semrush looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.