Malwarebytes vs Starling Bank

Malwarebytes (Cyberprotection for every one.) and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Malwarebytes (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 33). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Malwarebytes is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Malwarebytes is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Malwarebytes is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Malwarebytes. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Malwarebytes is ahead of Starling Bank.

Malwarebytes carries 38 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Starling Bank's footprint is roughly 5.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Malwarebytes is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.