Cyberprotection for every one.
Malwarebytes vs Perk
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Malwarebytes (Cyberprotection for every one.) and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Perk (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Malwarebytes (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 36). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Malwarebytes is ahead of Perk. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Malwarebytes is ahead of Perk. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is ahead of Malwarebytes. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Malwarebytes is slightly ahead of Perk. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Malwarebytes is ahead of Perk.
Malwarebytes carries 38 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Malwarebytes is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Perk looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Malwarebytes | Perk |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 42 |
| Code | 54 | 44 |
| Education | 73 | 54 |
| Community | 23 | 38 |
| Reach | 34 | 30 |
| Momentum | 66 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 38 | 34 |
| Forks | 6 | 11 |
| Public repos | 20 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 5 |
| External contributors | 3 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 33 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 28 | 38 |