Cyberprotection for every one.
Malwarebytes vs UserTesting
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Malwarebytes (Cyberprotection for every one.) and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Malwarebytes (rank #538) holds a narrow lead over UserTesting (rank #691) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Malwarebytes is ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Malwarebytes is ahead of UserTesting. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Malwarebytes is ahead of UserTesting. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Malwarebytes is slightly ahead of UserTesting. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Malwarebytes is clearly ahead of UserTesting.
Malwarebytes carries 38 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Malwarebytes is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UserTesting makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Malwarebytes | UserTesting |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #538 | #691 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 31 |
| Code | 54 | 37 |
| Education | 73 | 60 |
| Community | 23 | 12 |
| Reach | 34 | 33 |
| Momentum | 66 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 38 | 15 |
| Forks | 6 | 5 |
| Public repos | 20 | 119 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 0 |
| External contributors | 3 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 33 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 28 | 29 |