Matomo Analytics vs mParticle by Rokt

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics and mParticle by Rokt sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 96.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. mParticle by Rokt looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.