Matomo Analytics vs Narmi

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Narmi (Narmi modernizes financial institutions and the people they serve with digital-first banking solutions and an agile open platform.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #339) holds a modest lead over Narmi (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Narmi. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Narmi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Narmi. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Narmi. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Narmi.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,625 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 43 repositories active in the last 90 days and 36 external contributors on record. Narmi shows 69 stars across 10 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 443.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Narmi makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.