Matomo Analytics vs Qonto

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics and Qonto sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Qonto.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 61.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.