Matomo Analytics vs Recurly

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Recurly (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Matomo Analytics (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Recurly.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 19.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.