Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data »
Making sales tax filing easier for more than 20,000 online sellers and merchants across the world.
Matomo Analytics vs TaxJar
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and TaxJar (Making sales tax filing easier for more than 20,000 online sellers and merchants across the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Matomo Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over TaxJar (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), TaxJar is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), TaxJar is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of TaxJar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of TaxJar. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of TaxJar.
Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. TaxJar shows 490 stars across 39 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 62.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. TaxJar looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Matomo Analytics | TaxJar |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 31 |
| Code | 56 | 63 |
| Education | 67 | 71 |
| Community | 49 | 18 |
| Reach | 26 | 1 |
| Momentum | 74 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 30,600 | 490 |
| Forks | 5,936 | 279 |
| Public repos | 90 | 39 |
| Active repos (90d) | 46 | 1 |
| External contributors | 34 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 61 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 41 |