Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data »
World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Matomo Analytics vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Matomo Analytics (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 43). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 14.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Matomo Analytics | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 48 |
| Code | 56 | 58 |
| Education | 67 | 59 |
| Community | 49 | 37 |
| Reach | 26 | 47 |
| Momentum | 74 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 30,600 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 5,936 | 384 |
| Public repos | 90 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 46 | 14 |
| External contributors | 34 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 38 |