Matomo Analytics vs Uptime.com

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Uptime.com (Uptime.com is an industry-leading website monitoring solution.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Uptime.com (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Uptime.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Uptime.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Uptime.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Uptime.com is ahead of Matomo Analytics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Uptime.com.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Uptime.com shows 35 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 874.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Uptime.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.