Matomo Analytics vs Zammad

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Matomo Analytics (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 43). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Zammad.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 4.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.