Matomo Analytics vs Zoho

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Zoho (Unique and powerful suite of software to run your entire business, brought to you by a company with the long term vision to transform the way you work.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Zoho (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Zoho. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Zoho. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Zoho. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zoho is ahead of Matomo Analytics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zoho is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Zoho shows 756 stars across 244 public repos, 55 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 40.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zoho looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.