Matomo Analytics vs Zulip

Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 36). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zulip is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Zulip. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Zulip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Zulip.

Matomo Analytics carries 30,600 GitHub stars across 90 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors.

Matomo Analytics is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zulip looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.