Mattermost vs Wrike

Mattermost (Mattermost is a secure collaboration platform for connecting your teams, tools and processes to accelerate mission-critical work.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Mattermost (rank #38) holds a meaningful lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (62 vs 34). The gap of 28 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is ahead of Mattermost. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Mattermost carries 49,882 GitHub stars across 262 public repos, with 58 repositories active in the last 90 days and 105 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Mattermost's footprint is roughly 180.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Mattermost is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.