Metabase vs Moodle Development

Metabase and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 34). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Metabase is slightly ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 6.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Moodle Development makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.