Metabase vs ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company

Metabase and ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (Open, federated file sync & share. The original Enterprise File Sync and Share. AI-contributions welcome.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase and ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (51), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is slightly ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Metabase.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company shows 18,930 stars across 178 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 35 external contributors.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.