Metabase vs Palo Alto Networks

Metabase and Palo Alto Networks (We ensure each day is safer and more secure than the one before.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Palo Alto Networks (rank #93) holds a narrow lead over Metabase (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 51). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Palo Alto Networks is clearly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is ahead of Palo Alto Networks. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Palo Alto Networks is slightly ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Palo Alto Networks is slightly ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Palo Alto Networks is ahead of Metabase.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Palo Alto Networks shows 6,403 stars across 525 public repos, 66 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 7.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Palo Alto Networks looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.