Metabase vs Razorpay

Metabase and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Metabase (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 51). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of Metabase.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 13.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.