Metabase vs Sage

Metabase and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 33). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sage is slightly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is slightly ahead of Sage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is clearly ahead of Sage.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 23.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sage looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.