Metabase vs Segment
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Metabase and Segment both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Segment (rank #103) holds a narrow lead over Metabase (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 51). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Segment is slightly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is slightly ahead of Segment. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Segment is ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is slightly ahead of Segment. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is ahead of Segment.
Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Segment shows 58,406 stars across 421 public repos, 53 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors.
Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Segment looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Metabase | Segment |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #103 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 55 |
| Code | 49 | 57 |
| Education | 80 | 72 |
| Community | 39 | 56 |
| Reach | 41 | 40 |
| Momentum | 61 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 50,225 | 58,406 |
| Forks | 7,167 | 7,570 |
| Public repos | 100 | 421 |
| Active repos (90d) | 21 | 53 |
| External contributors | 49 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 41 |