Metabase vs Skyscanner

Metabase and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Skyscanner (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 49). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is ahead of Skyscanner.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 6.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Skyscanner looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.