Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Metabase vs SoundCloud

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Metabase and SoundCloud both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over SoundCloud (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 36). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Metabase is slightly ahead of SoundCloud. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is ahead of SoundCloud. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SoundCloud is slightly ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is ahead of SoundCloud.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. SoundCloud shows 8,606 stars across 56 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 5.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. SoundCloud looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricMetabaseSoundCloud
Ranking
Overall rank#165#536
Pillars
Overall5136
Code4942
Education8061
Community3939
Reach4145
Momentum6143
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars50,2258,606
Forks7,1671,142
Public repos10056
Active repos (90d)2117
External contributors494
Avg polish5046
Avg AI-readiness3032

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Metabase developer profileView SoundCloud developer profile