Metabase vs Starling Bank

Metabase and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 33). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is ahead of Starling Bank.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 257.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.