Metabase vs Vimeo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Metabase and Vimeo (You know, for videos.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Metabase (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Vimeo (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 49). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Vimeo is ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Vimeo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Vimeo is slightly ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is clearly ahead of Vimeo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is slightly ahead of Vimeo.
Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Vimeo shows 14,779 stars across 105 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 19 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 3.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Vimeo looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Metabase | Vimeo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #209 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 49 |
| Code | 49 | 63 |
| Education | 80 | 50 |
| Community | 39 | 45 |
| Reach | 41 | 19 |
| Momentum | 61 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 50,225 | 14,779 |
| Forks | 7,167 | 3,071 |
| Public repos | 100 | 105 |
| Active repos (90d) | 21 | 19 |
| External contributors | 49 | 19 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 38 |