Metabase vs Wrike

Metabase and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 34). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is slightly ahead of Wrike. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Metabase carries 50,225 GitHub stars across 100 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 182.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Metabase is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Wrike makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.