Miro vs Moodle Development

Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 34). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Moodle Development is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Miro.

Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Moodle Development's footprint is roughly 8.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Moodle Development looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.