Miro vs Paddle

Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Paddle both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Paddle (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 38). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is slightly ahead of Miro. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Paddle is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Paddle is clearly ahead of Miro.

Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Paddle shows 997 stars across 54 public repos, 22 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Paddle looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.