Visual workspace for innovation
Miro vs Patreon
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Patreon both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Patreon (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 36). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Patreon. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Patreon. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Patreon. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Patreon is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Miro is slightly ahead of Patreon.
Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Patreon shows 846 stars across 62 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Patreon looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Miro | Patreon |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 36 |
| Code | 58 | 52 |
| Education | 86 | 63 |
| Community | 32 | 26 |
| Reach | 0 | 61 |
| Momentum | 8 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 843 | 846 |
| Forks | 380 | 220 |
| Public repos | 45 | 62 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 0 |
| External contributors | 6 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 65 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 37 |