Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Miro vs pCloud Open Source

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and pCloud Open Source both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 32). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), pCloud Open Source is slightly ahead of Miro.

Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. pCloud Open Source shows 867 stars across 16 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.

Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. pCloud Open Source looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricMiropCloud Open Source
Ranking
Overall rank#485#662
Pillars
Overall3832
Code5839
Education8664
Community3227
Reach055
Momentum812
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars843867
Forks380285
Public repos4516
Active repos (90d)44
External contributors62
Avg polish6539
Avg AI-readiness3237

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Miro developer profileView pCloud Open Source developer profile