Visual workspace for innovation
Miro vs Podio
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Podio both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Podio (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is ahead of Podio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Podio. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Podio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Podio is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Podio is slightly ahead of Miro.
Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Podio shows 2,064 stars across 74 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Podio looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Miro | Podio |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 40 |
| Code | 58 | 42 |
| Education | 86 | 55 |
| Community | 32 | 25 |
| Reach | 0 | 54 |
| Momentum | 8 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 843 | 2,064 |
| Forks | 380 | 757 |
| Public repos | 45 | 74 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 8 |
| External contributors | 6 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 65 | 44 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 29 |