Miro vs Qonto

Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Qonto. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Qonto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is ahead of Miro.

Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Qonto looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.