Visual workspace for innovation
Miro vs Revolut
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) and Revolut (Revolut Open Source) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Revolut (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 31). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is ahead of Revolut. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Revolut. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Revolut. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Revolut is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Revolut is ahead of Miro.
Miro carries 843 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Revolut shows 260 stars across 35 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Miro's footprint is roughly 3.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Miro is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Revolut looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Miro | Revolut |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 31 |
| Code | 58 | 40 |
| Education | 86 | 52 |
| Community | 32 | 26 |
| Reach | 0 | 40 |
| Momentum | 8 | 20 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 843 | 260 |
| Forks | 380 | 142 |
| Public repos | 45 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 5 |
| External contributors | 6 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 65 | 38 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 29 |